Assessment Information
Assessed Exercises
There are 9 assessed exercises, each building on the previous one. Six of these exercises are categorized as
The remaining three are categorized as
Note
You must complete all the
The mark weighting for each exercise is provided in
You will have three scheduled laboratory sessions to complete these exercises. Marking will conclude at the end of the third laboratory session; any exercises not marked before the end of this session will receive a score of zero.
To complete all
This activity is structured sequentially: each exercise builds directly on preceding hardware configurations and software routines. Consequently, you do not need to dismantle your circuits between exercises, enabling efficient, incremental development.
Building the Robot
When assembling the system, you may choose to build the complete circuit upfront or assemble the electrical hardware incrementally as you progress through each exercise module. Detailed instructions for the mechanical and electrical assemblies are provided in the
Suggested Timeline for the Basic Exercises
While there is no rigid progression enforced for these exercises, the following schedule - summarized from the
There is no rigid structure for your progress through these exercises, but the following time plan, (this is a summary of the
If you plan to complete the
Note
You must have completed all
Peer Assessment (BuddyCheck)
There will be a BuddyCheck peer assessment for this module section, accessible via Blackboard. This assessment must be completed prior to the published deadline (details are available on Blackboard). Failure to submit the peer assessment by the deadline will result in an individual penalty: a 10% reduction of your final group mark (applicable only to non-submitting individuals).
All peer assessment submissions—including numerical scores and qualitative written feedback—are individually reviewed by teaching staff. Peer assessments are used solely to identify and address insufficient contribution to group work. Penalties are never applied based on quantitative peer scores alone; rather, scores are evaluated alongside written feedback and laboratory attendance records. (Written comments carry significantly more weight when determining whether a student should be penalized for lack of engagement and contribution.)